<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Sorry for the confusion.<BR><BR>SHANNON L. DILLON<BR><BR><BR> <BR>> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:38:22 -0700<BR>> From: rstigile@sbcglobal.net<BR>> To: cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> Hello Shannon,<BR>> I appreciate you letting me know that.<BR>> I was quite concerned when I saw that letter.<BR>> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>> Robert Stigile<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>> >From: "Shannon L. Dillon" <shannonldillon@hotmail.com<BR>> >To: CAGDU <cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >Date sent: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:48:09 -0700<BR>> >Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >Hi Robert:<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >No, Mary did not write the letter. Antonette, or someone from <BR>> the board, wrote a draft letter that they wanted the NFB to sign <BR>> onto. They contacted Mary about signing onto the letter. I <BR>> think they must have provided that draft letter like we provide <BR>> draft letters sometimes to people to make it easier for them to <BR>> support something. Like the draft letter we provided in support <BR>> of Fred Schroeder this year. Anyway, Mary forwarded the letter <BR>> onto to me to share with CAGDU and respond to. She did not <BR>> support the letter. She said that she has told Antonette that <BR>> she does not think we can support the Board. I don't know why <BR>> Mary's name is on the letter. Maybe whoever wrote the draft <BR>> included it on there. But Mary did not write the letter <BR>> supporting the board.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >SHANNON L. DILLON<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:49:12 -0700<BR>> >> From: rstigile@sbcglobal.net<BR>> >> To: cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >> Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> >> Hello Shannon,<BR>> >> Ok, I am confused, I saw a recent post that you sent, that <BR>> showed<BR>> >> a letter from Mary in support of this bill.<BR>> >> Did Mary write that letter, it has her name on it from what I<BR>> >> see.<BR>> >> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>> >> Robert Stigile<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> >>>From: "Shannon L. Dillon" <shannonldillon@hotmail.com<BR>> >>>To: CAGDU <cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >>>Date sent: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:44:59 -0700<BR>> >>>Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>I do not support the letter. I think they make a lot of<BR>> >> statements that they cannot back up in that letter. I think we<BR>> >> definitely need to let Senator Padilla know that we do not<BR>> >> support it.<BR>> <BR>> >>>SHANNON L. DILLON<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:12:27 -0700<BR>> >>>> From: rstigile@sbcglobal.net<BR>> >>>> To: cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >>>> Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> >>>> Hello,<BR>> >>>> I am not sure what gave them that idea, but I do not support<BR>> >> this<BR>> >>>> letter.<BR>> >>>> I would like to know, what the rest of you think.<BR>> >>>> Thanks,<BR>> <BR>> >>>> Robert Stigile<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> >>>>>From: "tina thomas " <tinadt@sbcglobal.net<BR>> >>>>>To: <cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >>>>>Date sent: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:44:59 -0700<BR>> >>>>>Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>Hey Shannon- Thanks for the clarification. I wonder what gave<BR>> >>>> the board the<BR>> >>>>>idea that NFBC would support this bill.<BR>> >>>>>Tina<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>"Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your<BR>> >>>> own instead of<BR>> >>>>>someone else's."<BR>> >>>>>- Billy Wilder<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>> _____<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>From: cagdu-bounces@nfbcal.org [mailto:cagdu-bounces@nfbcal.org]<BR>> >>>> On Behalf<BR>> >>>>>Of Shannon L. Dillon<BR>> >>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:41 PM<BR>> >>>>>To: CAGDU<BR>> >>>>>Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>No, Mary did not write this letter of support. It is a draft<BR>> >>>> letter written<BR>> >>>>>by the State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind. They were hoping<BR>> >>>> we would<BR>> >>>>>sign on to it.<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>SHANNON L. DILLON<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>> _____<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>From: tinadt@sbcglobal.net<BR>> >>>>>To: cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >>>>>Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:46:53 -0700<BR>> >>>>>Subject: Re: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>Hi Shannon- I need some clarification on this letter of support<BR>> >>>> by the NFBC.<BR>> >>>>>Mary did not write this letter of support?<BR>> >>>>>Tina<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>"Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your<BR>> >>>> own instead of<BR>> >>>>>someone else's."<BR>> >>>>>- Billy Wilder<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>> _____<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>From: cagdu-bounces@nfbcal.org [mailto:cagdu-bounces@nfbcal.org]<BR>> >>>> On Behalf<BR>> >>>>>Of Shannon L. Dillon<BR>> >>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:25 AM<BR>> >>>>>To: cagdu@nfbcal.org<BR>> >>>>>Subject: [Cagdu] FW: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>Sorry, everyone, this time the e-mail includes the attachments I<BR>> >>>> meant to be<BR>> >>>>>included last time. Don't know what happened before....<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>SHANNON L. DILLON<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>> _____<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>From: mwillows@sbcglobal.net<BR>> >>>>>To: shannonldillon@hotmail.com<BR>> >>>>>Subject: Fw: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> >>>>>Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:39:34 -0700<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>----- Original Message -----<BR>> >>>>>From: Antonette_Sorrick@dca.ca.gov<BR>> >>>>>To: mwillows@sbcglobal.net<BR>> >>>>>Cc: bbarragan@lif.org ; acandela@dor.ca.gov<BR>> >>>>>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:44 PM<BR>> >>>>>Subject: SB 475 (Padilla)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>Mary:<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>This e-mail is a follow up to the voicemail I left on your phone<BR>> >>>> today. The<BR>> >>>>>Board has a bill number for its annual school renewal payment<BR>> >>>> legislation.<BR>> >>>>>SB 475 (Padilla) will set the statutory limit on the Board's<BR>> >>>> school renewal<BR>> >>>>>payment while setting the exact rate via regulation. The bill<BR>> >>>> can be<BR>> >>>>>accessed online at<BR>> >>>>>http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_475<BR>> >>>>><http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_475&sess<BR>> >>>> =CUR&house=<BR>> >>>>>B&site=sen> &sess=CUR&house=B&site=sen<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>I have also attached a word document of the legislation along<BR>> >>>> with an<BR>> >>>>>amended draft letter of support from NFB, California. Thank you<BR>> >>>> for your<BR>> >>>>>consideration and have a wonderful weekend.<BR>> <BR>> >>>>>Antonette Sorrick<BR>> >>>>>Executive Officer<BR>> >>>>>State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind<BR>> >>>>>1625 North Market Blvd., Suite S-202<BR>> >>>>>Sacramento, CA 95834<BR>> >>>>>(916) 574-7825 phone<BR>> >>>>>(916) 574-7829 fax<BR>> >>>>>Antonette_Sorrick@dca.ca.gov<BR>> >>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>> >>>>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<BR>> >>>>>Version: 8.5.283 / Virus Database: 270.11.29/2023 - Release Date:<BR>> >>>> 03/26/09<BR>> >>>>>07:12:00<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> >>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>> >>>>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<BR>> >>>>>Version: 8.5.283 / Virus Database: 270.11.29/2023 - Release Date:<BR>> >>>> 03/26/09<BR>> >>>>>07:12:00<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR></body>
</html>